Ben Aronson, Assistant Professor(909) 793-2121 ext 2922Hedco Room 111ben_aronson@redlands.edu
|
![]() |
In the fall of 2002 the student projects involved a scenario in which isopods (also known as pillbugs) were spreading a bacterial disease that was causing human illness. Students identified bacteria associated with local isopod populations and studied ways to attempt to control the spread of the bacteria. Use the following links to view these student projects:
ABA Team: Allison Roeser, Brian Ballatore, and Alex Lanier AJJ Team: Amanda Wolfson, Jenna Johnson, and Josh Bullock BJM Team: Brittany Lirtzman , Juan Guzman, and Michael Nassutti HAL Team: Heather Oliphant and Allison Youngmeister JB Team: Jessie Hardy and Britany Hart KKJ Team: Kori Stockler, Kai Lyles and Jaime LewisIn the fall of 2004, students examined the toxicity of different commonly used pesticides towards non-target organisms. Their projects can be seen by using the following links:
SRC Team: Anne Ross, Caitlin Coulter, and Jason Sedlak
Team Turbo: Kyle Keller, Chris Briffett, and Cathleen Penney
KAD Team: Kyle Roberts, Angela Lopez, and Danielle Budrik
PAL Team: Pam Maganuco, April Salas, and Lauren Vetras
NMB Team: Natalie Tran, Michelle Thompson, and Bethany Frid
AC Team: Allison Tashlik and Courtney Hall

What
lies beneath; the study of the interaction between Drosophila and
its endosymbiont.Despite a century of intensive study of the fruit
fly Drosophila melanogaster, researchers only recently recognized
that in some individuals a tiny microbe called Wolbachia is harbored
within the Drosophila cells. Does the Wolbachia cause disease
in those individuals that are infected? Not really. There is, however,
a strange effect the bacteria has on the reproduction of uninfected flies.
Eggs that were a result of a mating between an uninfected female and infected
male are significantly less likely to hatch than eggs from any other type
of mating. This is particularly surprising since the sperm of an infected
male does not have any bacteria. So what could be the difference between
sperm from an infected versus uninfected male? What proteins from the fly
are necessary to cause this reduced hatch rate? Living inside of the cell
of another organism is a strange ecological niche. What challenges does
this microbe have in surviving in such an environment? To what extent does
the microbe rely on the host cell for specific nutrients? To what extent
does harboring the bacteria create the potential for a physiological stress
on the host? These are some of the questions that I am hoping to answer
using Drosophila genetics to probe for important host factors in
this close association between endosymbiont and host.
In the past several years I have had eight students working on various
projects. This work has been presented at the Southern California Conference
for Undergraduate Research at Long Beach and at the 42nd
Drosophila
Research Conferencein Washington, D.C. To the right is a picture of a student,
Joe Pearson, presenting his work at the SCCUR meeting in the fall of 2000.
Currently, three students are doing research. Aaron Abrahamsen is undertaking
a genetic screen to identify Drosophila genes that modify the viability
of Wolbachia-infected flies. Mike Hahn and Corie Kramer are initiating
experiments to examine the effects of temperature on the reproductive effect
induced by Wolbachia.
The results of my first cloning experiment are shown below. It can be seen that the experiment was largely successful since the cells from Snoop's tail gave rise to a cat that looks similar to Snoop. There are, however, indications that the experiment was not a complete success. First, the cloned cat (known as Growler) does not have as many white markings as Snoop. I believe this is because the cells that were used for cloning came from an area of Snoop that had no white markings. Second, Growler weighs much less than Snoop. This may be simply the result of diet. But perhaps more disturbing is that Growler is a female despite Snoop being a male. How could the cells of a male cat regenerate an animal that is a female? It is possible that during the culturing of the cells the Y chromosome was lost. Finally, recall that one goal of the project is to generate both greater curiosity and greater knowledge. But Growler is neither curious nor knowledgable. She seems to lounge about all day on the couch or bed. And while she is knowledgable enough to know that it is dinner time when the can opener pierces the can of Trader Joe's tuna, she cannot distinguish this situation from a can of Campbells mushroom soup being opened.
Figure 1. Snoop and his cloned companion Growler. Note the
lack of white coloring on Growler's face. Future work will be aimed at
making a clone of Snoop that is morphologically identical. Growler is being
carefully examined to see if there are any adverse health effects of the
cloning process. Some have reported that cloned animals show shortening
of the ends of chromosomes known as telomeres. This will be investigated
as will the peculiar behavioral traits of Growler. These behavioral traits
include loud squealing noises just prior to being fed, excessive sleeping,
and a clear obsession for Nepeta cataria.
Growing cats from seed. Finally, as a potential substitute for cat cloning or breeding, growing cats from seed might be appealing. I have been pursuing this line of research. One day I noticed some seed pods falling off of Snoop's well-groomed coat. At first I thought that these were from the Shammel ash tree in our yard. Yet I took the initiative to plant the seed in a terra cotta pot. I was as surprised as anyone when I saw the result (shown below) several weeks after planting the seed. This cat has been named Bustopher.
Figure 2. Bustopher just prior to flowering. Bustopher was planted on December 1st, 1998. Sprouting from a seed did not effect his general physical characteristics; in just several months he achieved maturity. This might be attributed to the constant watering that was provided. He currently weighs almost twelve pounds.